URL | https://Persagen.com/docs/lobbying-defense_contractors.html |
Sources | Persagen.com | Wikipedia | other sources (cited in situ) |
Source URL | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_industry |
Date published | 2021-09-15 |
Curation date | 2021-09-15 |
Curator | Dr. Victoria A. Stuart, Ph.D. |
Modified | |
Editorial practice | Refer here | Dates: yyyy-mm-dd |
Summary | |
Self-reported summary |
|
Main article | |
Key points |
|
Related |
|
Comment | Show |
Keywords | Show |
Named entities | Show |
Ontologies | Show |
Defense Contractors
Top 10 defense contractors by revenue (2009-2019) [source]. |
|
Description | |
Revenue | |
Expenses | |
Net assets | |
Known for |
|
Influenced by |
|
Influencer of |
|
Associations |
|
Affiliations |
|
Website |
Source for this subsection: Wikipedia, 2021-09-15.
The arms industry, also known as the arms trade, is a global industry which manufactures and sells weapons and military technology, and is a major component of the military-industrial complex. It consists of a commercial industry involved in the research and development, engineering, production, and servicing of military material, equipment, and facilities. Arms-producing companies, also referred to as arms dealers, or as the military industry, produce arms for the armed forces of states and for civilians. Departments of government also operate in the arms industry, buying and selling weapons, munitions and other military items. An arsenal is a place where arms and ammunition - whether privately or publicly owned - are made, maintained and repaired, stored, or issued, in any combination. Products of the arms industry include guns, artillery, ammunition, missiles, military aircraft, military vehicles, ships, electronic systems, night-vision devices, holographic weapon sights, laser rangefinders, laser sights, hand grenades, landmines and more. The arms industry also provides other logistical and operational support.
The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) estimated military expenditures as of 2018 at $1822 billion. This represented a relative decline from 1990, when military expenditures made up 4% of world Gross domestic product (GDP). Part of the money goes to the procurement of military hardware and services from the military industry. The combined arms-sales of the top 100 largest arms-producing companies and military services companies (excluding China) totaled $420 billion in 2018, according to SIPRI. This was 4.6 percent higher than sales in 2017 and marks the fourth consecutive year of growth in Top 100 arms sales. In 2004 over $30 billion were spent in the international arms-trade (a figure that excludes domestic sales of arms). According to the institute, the volume of international transfers of major weapons in 2014-18 was 7.8 percent higher than in 2009-13 and 23 percent higher than in 2004-2008. The five largest exporters in 2014-18 were the United States, Russia, France, Germany and China whilst the five biggest importers were Saudi Arabia, India, Egypt, Australia and Algeria.
Many industrialized countries have a domestic arms-industry to supply their own military forces. Some countries also have a substantial legal or illegal domestic trade in weapons for use by their own citizens, primarily for self-defense, hunting or sporting purposes. Illegal trade in small arms occurs in many countries and regions affected by political instability. The Small Arms Survey estimates that 875 million small arms circulate worldwide, produced by more than 1,000 companies from nearly 100 countries.
Governments award contracts to supply their country's military; such arms contracts can become of substantial political importance. The link between politics and the arms trade can result in the development of what U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower described in 1961 as a military-industrial complex, where the armed forces, commerce, and politics become closely linked, similarly to the European multilateral defense procurement. Various corporations, some publicly held, others private, bid for these contracts, which are often worth many billions of dollars. Sometimes, as with the contract for the international Joint Strike Fighter, a competitive tendering process takes place, with the decision made on the merits of the designs submitted by the companies involved. Other times, no bidding or competition takes place.
TIV of arms exports, 2011-2020. | ||||||||||||
Notes: • Figures are SIPRI Trend Indicator Values (TIVs) expressed in millions. The overall total (all countries, 1950-2020) is 1,973,386,000,000 i.e. 1.973 trillion TIV. • SIPRI uses a unique pricing system, the trend-indicator value (TIV), to measure the volume of deliveries of major conventional weapons. The SIPRI TIV measures transfers of military capability rather than the financial value of arms transfers. This common unit can be used to measure trends in the flow of arms between particular countries and regions over time - in effect, a military capability price index. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the pricing system remains consistent across both the weapon systems covered and over time, and that any changes introduced are backdated. The SIPRI TIV is often misinterpreted as a financial value. However, it neither reflects the actual price paid for weapons nor represents current dollar values for arms transfers. The TIV should therefore not be compared directly with gross national product (GNP), gross domestic product (GDP), military expenditure, sales values or the financial value of arms export licences. However, TIVs can be used as the raw data for calculating trends in international arms transfers over periods of time; indicative global percentages for suppliers and recipients; and percentages for the volume of transfers to or from particular states. The fact that the SIPRI TIV figure sometimes closely matches estimates and official financial values for arms exports has no doubt contributed to the misconception that the SIPRI TIV figure is a financial value for arms exports. Purely by coincidence, in the case of Germany the 2018 SIPRI TIV figure of 1.2 billion TIV, the United States Congressional Research Service (CRS) financial value of $1.6 billion, and the national government figure of $1.65 billion are all close. However, each method uses a different unit of measurement, relies on different sources of data and uses a different definition of 'arms.' • Total per row span 1950-2020; totals by column include all countries. • For brevity, older data is omitted, and only countries with the most exports are shown. The complete data are available via this LibreOffice spreadsheet (*.ods format). • Note that Wikipedia incorrectly reports TIV values. For example, for the United States in 2020, Wikipedia reports a value of 9,372 billion, i.e. 9.372 trillion. The actual value (per SIPRI) is 9,372 million, i.e., 9.372 billion. This assertion is confirmed by data shown here for 2018 [local copy], which correctly reads the SIPRI data; e.g.,  arms exports from the United States in 2018 was 10,508,000,000 (10.508 billion) TIV. • n.d.: no data [The total for Czechoslovakia is based on historical data, not present in this (truncated) table.] • Source: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2021-09-15. |
||||||||||||
Country | Total | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ... |
United States | 703,480 | 9,372 | 10,788 | 9,895 | 12,070 | 9,868 | 9,937 | 9,604 | 7,485 | 9,056 | 8,940 | ... |
Soviet Union / Russia | 600,252 | 3,203 | 5,226 | 6,753 | 6,088 | 6,790 | 5,922 | 5,469 | 7,919 | 8,180 | 8,676 | ... |
United Kingdom | 143,011 | 429 | 907 | 703 | 1,237 | 1,393 | 1,180 | 1,651 | 1,608 | 929 | 1,055 | ... |
France | 127,906 | 1,995 | 3,269 | 1,784 | 2,359 | 2,088 | 2,043 | 1,656 | 1,493 | 1,029 | 1,735 | ... |
Germany | 88,839 | 1,232 | 978 | 1,070 | 1,944 | 2,506 | 1,763 | 1,790 | 791 | 750 | 1,311 | ... |
China | 57,031 | 760 | 1,472 | 1,169 | 1,438 | 2,410 | 1,780 | 1,212 | 2,067 | 1,526 | 1,271 | ... |
Italy | 33,846 | 806 | 321 | 535 | 791 | 618 | 676 | 672 | 861 | 741 | 963 | ... |
Czechoslovakia | 29,421 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | ... |
Netherlands | 24,994 | 488 | 238 | 448 | 1,050 | 471 | 461 | 631 | 374 | 858 | 546 | ... |
Israel | 18,222 | 345 | 363 | 704 | 1,268 | 1,464 | 790 | 399 | 419 | 458 | 546 | ... |
Switzerland | 17,894 | 179 | 226 | 240 | 173 | 215 | 479 | 343 | 194 | 242 | 340 | ... |
Spain | 17,199 | 1,201 | 989 | 1,025 | 820 | 471 | 1,162 | 1,051 | 733 | 545 | 1,428 | ... |
Sweden | 15,486 | 286 | 172 | 155 | 80 | 265 | 179 | 339 | 386 | 477 | 696 | ... |
Canada | 12,970 | 200 | 211 | 115 | 70 | 110 | 337 | 189 | 183 | 266 | 317 | ... |
Ukraine | 12,156 | 115 | 96 | 196 | 307 | 487 | 353 | 632 | 654 | 1,501 | 570 | ... |
Poland | 8,419 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 24 | 142 | 24 | 8 | ... |
South Korea | 7,739 | 827 | 693 | 1,056 | 742 | 480 | 94 | 207 | 349 | 224 | 350 | ... |
Norway | 4,408 | 72 | 31 | 59 | 146 | 122 | 210 | 163 | 173 | 170 | 151 | ... |
Brazil | 3,813 | 170 | 10 | 100 | 37 | 122 | 52 | 31 | 31 | 33 | 31 | ... |
... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
Total | 1,973,386 | 22,831 | 27,105 | 27,028 | 31,762 | 31,438 | 28,638 | 27,073 | 27,174 | 27,995 | 30,043 | ... |
[ExposedByCMD.org, 2021-09-15] Defense Giants Spend Big on Lobbying and Elections to Boost Post-9/11 Profits.
The Pentagon has spent an enormous amount of money - an estimated $14 trillion - in the 20 years since the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 following the 9/11 terror attacks. As much as half of that amount went to private defense contractors, with the five biggest companies scoring as much as one-third of these private contracts.
As these five companies - Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon - earned up to $2.3 trillion in Pentagon contracts during the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, they collectively spent a considerable amount, over $1.2 billion, on federal lobbying and campaign contributions, the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) has found.
Meanwhile, these companies' stocks combined to increase in value almost ten-fold over the past 20 years, and numerous members of Congress have personally benefited. According to an analysis by Sludge, a bipartisan group of at least 11 senators and 36 representatives own as much as $6.7 million worth of defense industry stocks, including all five of the defense giants.
Most or all of these members of Congress have voted to increase the military budget, and some voted to authorize the use of military force in September 2001 and to go to war with Iraq the following year. Some sit on the House's Armed Services Committee, presenting a glaring conflict of interest, and many have received campaign donations from the companies' political action committees (PACs).
The Pentagon has a cozy relationship with the major defense companies. For example, the current secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, sat on the board of Raytheon and made up to $1.7 million as he exited the company to run the Pentagon.
[RealSludge.com, 2021-08-23] Lawmakers Benefit From Booming Defense Stocks. Here are the members of Congress who own stock in defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon.
[theBrick.House, 2021-08-31] Defense Contractors Are Top Donors to House Election Objectors, Report Finds.
Return to Persagen.com