Who Is the University of Austin For?
The project's uphill battle points to a deeper contradiction within what might be called neo-neoconservatism.
URL |
https://Persagen.com/docs/neoconservatism-university_of_austin_texas.html |
Former The New York Times opinion editor Bari Weiss.
[source]
|
Sources |
Persagen.com | other sources (cited in situ) |
Source URL |
https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/university-austin/ |
Title |
Who Is the University of Austin For? |
Subtitle |
The project's uphill battle points to a deeper contradiction within what might be called neo-neoconservatism. |
Author |
David Klion is an editor at Jewish Currents and has written for The Nation, The New York Times, The New Republic, and other publications. |
Date published |
2021-11-26 |
Curation date |
2021-11-26 |
Curator |
Dr. Victoria A. Stuart, Ph.D. |
Modified |
|
Editorial practice |
Refer here | Date format: yyyy-mm-dd |
Summary |
The University of Austin (UATX) is a proposed American private liberal arts college announced in 2021 to be located in Austin, Texas. It has been described as "anti-cancel culture" and "anti-woke." As of 2021-11 the venture was reliant on a fiscal sponsor and was seeking accreditation. |
Main article |
Social conservatism |
Related |
|
|
Show
Proponents of the University of Austin argue that higher education is "broken," claiming the need for the "fearless pursuit of truth."
While the Main Article below does not mention the influence of religious doctrine in shaping the agenda of the University of Austin, the role of Christian conservative ideology in shaping the narrative presented is explicitly stated by University of Austin advisory board member Sohrab Ahmari (a self-described political Catholic) in an article he wrote, included below as an accompanying article.
The Main Article states: "Based out of Texas’s capital, which recently became home to the anti-anti-woke Tesla, Inc. CEO Elon Musk and the like-minded podcaster Joe Rogan, UATX promised to offer bright young undergraduates an alternative to the stale liberal dogmas on race and gender."
Setting aside the moral issues of concentration of wealth (Elon Musk), Joe Rogan is noted for his transphobic comments. Likewise, the evisceration of transgender rights during the Trump administration was largely driven by his Christian appointees (Benjamin Carson; Roger Severino; Betsy DeVos; others). The ongoing erasure of transgender rights and protections in numerous states (notably Texas) continues to harm transgender and nonbinary persons.
Anti-transgender dogma is likely to be prevalent at the University of Austin. Kathleen Stock - a founding fellow at the University of Austin - is a notorious transphobe. Likewise, the transphobic views of University of Austin advisory board member Sohrab Ahmari are evident in his defense of notorious transphobe Maya Forstater in a 2019-12-19 article [local copy] - as is his use of the archaic and disparaging term transvestic fetishism in other transphobic attacks.
Critical race theory has been hijacked and corrupted by the U.S. conservatives / Republicans to thwart advances in racial equality, and rollback existing protections - while fostering white supremacy and white nationalism.
Given those observations, the intention of the University of Austin to address "stale liberal dogmas on race and gender" is especially ominous and foreboding. At risk is additional abrogation of basic human rights and liberties, including the fundamental right to self-determination. Issues involving self-determination include women's rights, including reproductive rights including access to birth control, and access to abortion. With the passage of the Texas Heartbeat Act of 2021, access to legal and safe abortion is now nearly impossible in Texas.
Numerous notable neoconservatives are associated with the University of Austin, which indicates a continuation and intensification of the highly divisive social environment that flourished during the Trump administraion, and continues to pervade the Republican Party.
As mentioned, true agenda of the University of Austin is suggested in the accompanying article by Sohrab Ahmari. Continually citing the Roman Catholic convert John Henry Newman [Sohrab Ahmari himself converted from atheism to Roman Catholicism], Ahmari argues for limits on empiricism and the scientific method, arguing that "presuppositional truths" [i.e., presuppositional apologetics] impose limits on those avenues of rational inquiry. Likewise, he cautions against unrestricted freedom of conscience [i.e., freedom of thought]. Those arguments form the basis of discrimination via conscientious objection - one of the tactics deployed by Christian social conservatives to refuse healthcare services to transgender persons, to restrict or deny access to abortion, and to refuse to provide other services (e.g. performing same-sex marriage and services).
Sohrab Ahmari continues: "... truth itself may sometimes demand limits on speech and inquiry ..." - a direct attack on freedom of speech and freedom of thought, the pillars of higher education. Ahmari's essay concludes: "I think it's just about time that we orthodox believers returned the favor to liberal institutions - and to treat our presence within them as a test of their liberality, according to their own principles."
The Wikipedia page on Sohrab Ahmari provides additional insight into his personality and intellect.
" ... A high-profile dispute between Ahmari and National Review writer David French broke out over the summer of 2019 ... The dispute began on May 26, 2019, when Ahmari expressed on Twitter his frustration with a Facebook advertisement for a children's drag queen reading hour at a library in Sacramento, California, which he described as 'transvestic fetishism'. ... On September 5, 2019, French and Ahmari engaged in an in-person political debate moderated by The New York Times columnist Ross Douthat at the Catholic University of America in Washington D.C. ... The dispute centered around their differing opinions on how conservatives should approach cultural and political debate, with Ahmari deriding what he calls "David French-ism', a political persuasion he defines as believing 'that the institutions of a technocratic market society are neutral zones that should, in theory, accommodate both traditional Christianity and the libertine ways and paganized ideology of the other side'. He [Sohrab Ahmari] argues that this belief leads to an ineffective conservative movement, and contends that the best way for culturally conservative values to prevail in society is a strategy of 'discrediting...opponents and weakening or destroying their institutions' ... He [Sohrab Ahmari] argues that the political realm should be viewed as one of 'war and enmity', and that the power of the government should be directly utilized to impose culturally conservative values on society. French, by contrast, advocates a conservative libertarian approach in which decency, civility, and respect for individual rights are emphasized ..."
Many of the dogmatic tropes espoused in the article, below - and particularly in the appended article by Sohrab Ahmari - limits on speech and thought - are echoed in a recent MotherJones article.
"Archbishop Gomez delivered a polarizing public address at a conference in Spain arguing that "wokeness," "social justice," and "intersectionality" were "dangerous" and "atheistic" pseudo-religions that "have come to fill the space that Christian belief and practice once occupied."
|
Keywords |
Show
- American imperialism | Catholic critic | Christian right | Medieval age | abortion | academics | accreditation | accredited | accredited universities | accredited university | activists | advisory board | anti-liberal | anti-woke | assault on higher education | assets | authoritarianism | backlash | botched rollout | branches of knowledge | campus | cancel culture | capitalism | censorship | center | civil discourse | classical liberals | cognitive psychology | columnist | conformity | conscience | conservatism | courses | cultural hegemony | culture wars | dead traditions | deception | defensive | degree-granting programs | discovered | dissident voice | dissidents | donors | e-learning | education | elite culture | elite schools | embarrassment | engineering | faculty | faculty fellows | financial challenges | foreign policy | former president | foundations | founding members | free expression | free inquiry | free speech | free-speech radicals | freedom of conscience | freedom of inquiry | freedom of speech | gender | gnostic | grandiose ambitions | grift | higher education | human nature | humanistic fields | identity politics | ideological composition | ideologically | ideology | illiberalism | in-person learning | infanticide | institution of higher learning | intellectual inquiry | intellectuals | journalists | leading universities | left-leaning politics | left-wing | liberal | liberal arts | liberal establishment | liberal institutions | liberalism | libertarians | luminary | media manipulation | mental freedom | modern university | moral authority | moral framework | moral law | multiculturalists | natural law | natural sciences | neocon | neoconservatism | neoconservative | neoliberalism | neoliberals | non-liberal | nonscientific disciplines | opprobrium | orthodox Catholic | orthodox believers | orthodoxy | parents | philosophy professor | podcaster | political correctness | political ideologies | presuppositional | progressive liberals | propaganda | protégé | pursuit of truth | quest for knowledge | race | racial | religion | religious conservatism | religious doctrine | research programs | resignation | rhetoric | right-wing | right-wing politics | secret societies | sinecures | slavery | social conservatism | social justice | spirituality | statement | status quo | students | subjectivized | technology | terse statement | touchstone | transmission | truth | tweet | tweeted | universal moral law | universities | university | university of Austin | university presidents | went public | woke | woke politics | woke university | wokeness | working-class
|
Named entities |
Show
- ACLU | Allan Bloom | Allan David Bloom | American Civil Liberties Union | American Enterprise Institute | Andrew Michael Sullivan | Andrew Sullivan | Annapolis | Annapolis, Maryland | Arthur Brooks | Austin | Austin, Texas | Ayaan Ali | Ayaan Hirsi Ali | Bari Weiss | Bill McClay | Bret Stephens | Caitlin Flanagan | Catholic | Catholic Church | Christianity | Columbia University | Concordia College | Deirdre McCloskey | Deirdre Nansen McCloskey | Department of Holocaust Revisionism | E. Gordon Gee | Elon Musk | Elwood "E." Gordon Gee | Elwood Gordon Gee | Free Speech U | Geoffrey R. Stone | Geoffrey Stone | Glenn Cartman Loury | Glenn Loury | God and Man at Yale | Harvard University | Hirsi Ali | Idea of the University | Iraq War | Irving Kristol | Jacob Bacharach | Jeet Heer | Jews | Joe Rogan | John Arthur Nunes | John Henry Newman | John Newman | John Nunes | Jonathan David Haidt | Jonathan Haidt | Joshua Katz | Kathleen Stock | Larry Summers | Lawrence Summers | Leo Strauss | Leon Kass | Leon Richard Kass | Maryland | Muslim world | Nadine Strossen | Nathan Glazer | New Left | Niall Campbell Ferguson | Niall Ferguson | Nikole Hannah-Jones | Oxford movement | Panayiotis "Pano" Kanelos | Panayiotis "Peter | Pano" Kanelos | Panayiotis "Peter" Kanelos | Panayiotis ("Peter" | "Pano") Kanelos | Panayiotis Kanelos | Pano Kanelos | Papuans | Peter Boghossian | Peter Kanelos | Politically Correct University | Potemkin university | Proust | Ravelstein | Robert Zimmer | Saul Bellow | Sohrab Ahmari | Solomon Bellows | St. John's College | St. John's College, Annapolis | Steven Pinker | Substack | Tesla | Tesla, Inc. | Texas | The Closing of the American Mind | The Idea of the University | The Nation | The New York Times | The Unbroken Thread | Thomas Aquinas | Tolstoy | Trump University | Tyler Cowen | UATX | UC Berkeley | University of Austin | University of California, Berkeley | University of Chicago | Vickie Sullivan | Victorian England | Victorian liberalism | Western canon | Wikipedia | Wilfred "Bill" McClay | Wilfred M. "Bill" McClay | Wilfred M. McClay | William Buckley | William F. Buckley | World War II | Zulus
|
Ontologies |
Show
- Culture - Cultural studies - Media culture - Deception - Media manipulation - Propaganda
- Culture - Spirituality - Religion - Christianity - Catholic Church
- Humanities - Philosophy - Epistemology - Theories - Dogma - Apologetics
- Humanities - Philosophy - Metaphysics - Theism - Theology - Christian theology - Apologetics - Christian apologetics - Presuppositional apologetics
- Nature - Earth - Geopolitical - Countries - United States - Society - Education - Universities - University of Austin
- Science - Social sciences - Economics - Economic systems - Capitalism - Ideology - Neoliberalism
- Society - Issues - Education - Christian right
- Society - Issues - Religion - Christian right
- Society - Issues - Religion - Christian right - Catholic Church
- Society - Issues - Religion - Christian right - Education
- Science - Social sciences - Psychology - Behaviorism - Conformity - Enforcement - Proscription - Censorship - Cancel culture
- Society - Politics - Political ideologies - Conservatism
- Society - Politics - Political ideologies - Conservatism - Social conservatism - Religious conservatism - Christian right
- Society - Politics - Political ideologies - Conservatism - Social conservatism
- Society - Politics - Political ideologies - Identity politics- Woke politics
- Society - Politics - Political ideologies - Liberalism
- Society - Politics - Political ideologies - Neoconservatism
- Technology - Internet - Email - Providers - Substack
|
Main Article
The University of Austin (UATX) was announced to great fanfare on Monday, 2021-11-08, on the popular Substack of former The New York Times opinion editor Bari Weiss. "We got sick of complaining about how broken higher education is," Weiss tweeted that morning, "So we decided to do something about it. Announcing a new university dedicated to the fearless pursuit of truth." Headed by Pano Kanelos [Panayiotis "Peter | Pano" Kanelos | local copy], the former president of St. John's College in Annapolis, Maryland UATX boasted a roster of prominent academics and journalists known for pushing back against what they see as the cultural hegemony of "wokeness" that has supposedly undermined free expression and intellectual inquiry at America's leading universities.
University of Austin
The University of Austin (UATX) is a proposed American private liberal arts college announced in 2021 to be located in Austin, Texas. It has been described as "anti-cancel culture" and "anti-woke." As of 2021-11 the venture was reliant on a fiscal sponsor and was seeking accreditation.
... The founding faculty fellows include Peter Boghossian, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and Kathleen Stock. Other founders include former Harvard University President Lawrence Summers, former American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) President Nadine Strossen, and former president of the American Enterprise Institute Arthur Brooks.
The University of Austin's website said "We count among our numbers university presidents: Robert Zimmer, Lawrence Summers, John Arthur Nunes [Concordia College | closing in 2021 | local copy], and Elwood "E." Gordon Gee, and leading academics, such as Steven Pinker, Deirdre Nansen McCloskey, Leon Richard Kass, Jonathan David Haidt, Glenn Cartman Loury, Joshua Katz, Vickie Sullivan, Geoffrey R. Stone, Wilfred M. "Bill" McClay [see also | local copy], and Tyler Cowen. We are a dedicated crew that grows by the day." ... Harvard University professor Steven Pinker said that although he was part of the advisory board, he had no plans to teach there; he later resigned from the board. president Elwood "E." Gordon Gee went further, stating that he did not consider higher education to be "irreparably broken" and did not believe that universities were "no longer seeking the truth."
... The University of Austin project drew "withering criticism" on social media, including tweets by journalist and academic Nikole Hannah-Jones and others who drew comparisons with Trump University ...
[Source: Wikipedia, 2021-11-26].]
"I am not alone," wrote Pano Kanelos [Panayiotis "Peter | Pano" Kanelos | local copy | see also] in the announcement. He then rattled off a list of cofounders that included Bari Weiss, Niall Campbell Ferguson, Andrew Michael Sullivan, Steven Pinker, Jonathan David Haidt, Glenn Cartman Loury, Caitlin Flanagan, Tyler Cowen, and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, as well as former and current university presidents like Harvard University's Lawrence Summers and the University of Chicago's Robert Zimmer. Based out of Texas' capital [Austin] - which recently became home to the anti-woke Tesla, Inc. CEO Elon Musk and the like-minded podcaster Joe Rogan - UATX promised to offer bright young undergraduates an alternative to the stale liberal dogmas on race and gender. Focused around the "great books," the university of Austin would design its curriculum "in partnership not only with great teachers but also society's great doers - founders of daring ventures, dissidents who have stood up to authoritarianism, pioneers in technology, and the leading lights in engineering and the natural sciences." Anticipating the inevitable jeers from donors, foundations, activists, parents, students, and faculty in support of the status quo, Pano Kanelos added: "We welcome their opprobrium and will regard it as vindication."
Unfortunately for Pano Kanelos [local copy | see also], opprobrium has quickly become the least of his problems. Within a week of its announcement, several of the aforementioned luminaries who had gathered around the project were already distancing themselves. Robert Zimmer, the President of the University of Chicago, resigned from UATX' advisory board with a terse statement implying that Pano Kanelos had possibly misled him about the nature of his proposed involvement and "noting that the new university made a number of statements about higher education in general, largely quite critical, that diverged very significantly from my own views." Steven Pinker, who teaches cognitive psychology at Harvard University, was even more succinct in his resignation: Announcing in a tweet that he was withdrawing from the board, he added that he "won't be speaking on this further." (In a defensive statement on November 15, UATX acknowledged some "missteps" in its rollout of the advisory board.)
As many commentators have already noted, the problems with UATX run deeper than a botched rollout. In a conversation with The Nation's Jeet Heer, the writer Jacob Bacharach laid out the underlying financial challenges of setting up a real institution of higher learning, as opposed to a "Potemkin university" with no assets, no degree-granting programs, no campus, no courses, and no research programs. For now, the latter is all UATX is - and for it to become anything more, it will have to raise staggering sums of money from ideologically like-minded donors, which, one reasonably suspects, is perhaps the main purpose of the project. In the meantime, those advisers who already have coveted and lucrative gigs at accredited universities are making it clear that they have no intention of abandoning those sinecures.
Only time will tell whether UATX can deliver on its grandiose ambitions, or whether it will reveal itself as a de facto grift and a source of embarrassment for everyone who was briefly associated with it. But even if it does manage to produce something resembling an actual university, UATX will never truly compete with those elite schools that it has pitted itself against. The project's uphill battle points to a deeper contradiction within what might be called the recent wave of neoconservatism that has emerged in response to the social justice movements of the past decade. That contradiction, simply put, is that these intellectuals, like their neoconservative predecessors, depend on elite institutions for legitimacy.
Some of the figures involved in UATX are directly rooted in the neocon lineage; Bari Weiss, for instance, is a protégé of the neoconservative The New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, while Niall Campbell Ferguson and his wife, Hirsi Ali [Ayaan Hirsi Ali], have been vocal champions of Anglo-American imperialism [American imperialism] in the Muslim world. Although today neoconservatism is usually linked to the foreign policy doctrine that gave us the Iraq War, it originated as a backlash to the New Left of the late 1960s, which challenged the mid-century liberal establishment's authority on every front - including by revolting against the administrations of leading universities like Columbia University and University of California, Berkeley [UC Berkeley]. Some of the foundational figures in the movement, like Nathan Glazer and Irving Kristol - both of whom had grown up as working-class Jews with left-leaning politics [left-wing politics] - achieved professional success in elite universities after World War II, and the New Left's assault on higher education played a major role in spurring their shift to the right [right-wing politics].
The neoconservative reaction to left-wing activism on campus has guided the center and the right through multiple iterations of campus culture wars ever since. When Pano Kanelos [local copy | see also] writes that UATX students "will be exposed to the deepest wisdom of civilization and learn to encounter works not as dead traditions but as fierce contests of timeless significance that help human beings distinguish between what is true and false, good and bad, beautiful and ugly," it's hard not to hear echoes of Leo Strauss, the political philosopher and defender of the Western canon who counted many key neoconservatives as his disciples; or of Allan David Bloom's 1987 book The Closing of the American Mind, a touchstone of that era's fights over campus political correctness; or of Allan Bloom's close friend Saul Bellow [born: Solomon Bellows], who fictionalized Allan Bloom in his novel Ravelstein, and who mocked multiculturalists by challenging them to name "the Tolstoy of the Zulus, the Proust of the Papuans."
Additional Reading
[Sohrab Ahmari, The American Conservative, 2021-11-16] Why I Joined the University of Austin's Advisory Board. An institution committed to the free pursuit of truth is better than one that is openly hostile to Truth.
While I generally exclude The American Conservative as an informational source, this essay - from a member of the University of Austin - provides insight into the { neoconservative | Christian right | neoliberal | ... } ideologies and mindsets of persons associated with the University of Austin.
The new University of Austin went public last week, and ever since, it has attracted national and global attention. And acted as a lightning rod for criticism, much of it weighted with stupidity, if not downright malice ("So a 'woke university' is one that is accredited, offers degrees [and] has a campus. . . . I'll take it," snarked The New York Times' Nikole Hannah-Jones, knowing full well that a startup institution will need some time to reach these milestones).
One of the most common charges is that UATX, as it's known to friends, is somehow a right-wing project. Wrong: The institution stands confidently in the liberal tradition. In his launch statement, UATX President Pano Kanelos [Panayiotis "Peter | Pano" Kanelos | local copy | see also] decried the "illiberalism" besetting much of academia these days. The answer, he argued, is greater "freedom of inquiry and civil discourse." That such rhetoric codes as "right-wing" doesn't make Pano Kanelos any less of a liberal - it only reinforces his lament for the modern university and the elite culture it has bred.
The ideological composition of the founding members and advisory board is also telling. There are neoliberals (Larry Summers; Bari Weiss), conservative liberals (Arthur Brooks,, Wilfred M. "Bill" McClay [see also | local copy], Leon Richard Kass, Niall Campbell Ferguson), libertarians and classical liberals (Tyler Cowen, Deirdre Nansen McCloskey), progressive liberals (Kathleen Stock), and others who best fit in the various interstices of these categories (Peter Boghossian; Caitlin Flanagan; Glenn Cartman Loury).
Then there is me - Sohrab Ahmari - the only member who can be described as fully and unapologetically a non-liberal, even an anti-liberal. Why did I join UATX's advisory board?
I'm a political Catholic, whose most recent book includes a chapter titled, "Should You Think for Yourself?" In it, I draw on the work of Saint John Henry Newman - the Oxford movement luminary turned Catholic critic of Victorian liberalism - to argue that liberal "freedom of conscience" is nonsensical, since it divorces mental freedom from the claims of moral authority and the universal moral law inscribed in our nature.
Insofar as conscience reflects the dictates of the law, John Henry Newman would give it the widest freedom. But as I write in The Unbroken Thread, he would reject the thoroughly subjectivized, and thoroughly modern, account of conscience according to which one conscience may approve of abortion (infanticide) and another conscience disapprove, and "no can say for sure which of the two consciences is in the right."
John Henry Newman, moreover, viewed the liberal promise of absolute freedom of conscience - and, by extension, absolute freedom of speech and inquiry - as illusory and unrealistic. Some orthodoxy or other would always prevail in society. That was true in Newman's Victorian England, notwithstanding the absolutist claims of the era's liberals. And it's also true of our society - and our universities. The quest for knowledge will always be carried out within some substantive moral framework, and it can't be abstracted from what we believe about man's origins, nature, and ultimate destiny.
These Newman-inspired lines of thought animate my approach to UATX. As I tweeted on launch day, "I don't, in fact, believe that the university can or should enshrine mere free speech or free inquiry as its highest ideal." That, of course, doesn't mean that free speech and inquiry are unimportant, or that they shouldn't have a place on campus. What it does mean is that these things should be treated as a means to an end - namely, truth.
Some quests for truth and some branches of knowledge are especially well-served by free speech and inquiry. This is the case with natural sciences - though even there, other, presuppositional truths [i.e., presuppositional apologetics] impose limits. Experiments on human subjects, for example, are supposed to be limited by ethical maxims that are more received (from tradition, from nonscientific disciplines, from revelation) than they are discovered.
In humanistic fields, meanwhile, the proper task of the university is transmission, since human nature is unchanging and unchangeable. As John Henry Newman wrote in The Idea of the University, these fields have as their concern a set of truths that "never changes, but cautiously advances." The natural law is the natural law, for example. A student might apply it to new problems, but he can't alter its fundamental precepts without violating its integrity as natural law.
As for the claim that there is no escaping the limits of some orthodoxy or other, well, who can observe the modern college campus and insist that it's otherwise? It is precisely this fact that inspired the founders of the University of Austin to start a new institution, to escape today's prevailing orthodoxies - into the "fearless pursuit of truth," as Pano Kanelos [local copy] put it in his statement, made possible by free inquiry. But then again, truth itself may sometimes demand limits on speech and inquiry: The founders of UATX surely don't want to see a Department of Holocaust Revisionism spring up, or to see a philosophy professor making a passionate case for slavery.
I suspect there is no permanent return to the Free Speech U that emerged postwar [World War II]: during the brief interlude between the traditional, morally authoritative university defended by John Henry Newman (and William F. Buckley in God and Man at Yale) and the rise of the Politically Correct University beginning in the 1980s and '90s. Free Speech U contained within itself all the conditions that made possible and necessary Politically Correct University. Indeed, it was often the same campus free-speech radicals of the 1960s who by the 1990s were operating the censorious, therapeutic machinery of the new university.
So why would someone with my views about the university join the experiment launched by Pano Kanelos and his team?
When they asked me to join, I laid out precisely this critique of their project and made clear that I would be a dissident voice. They didn't mind. Indeed, they welcomed the prospect of a traditionalist internal dissident with a seat at the table. This was admirable to me. There is much else in their project, too, that I find attractive, not least the emphasis on in-person learning over and against the current drive toward neo-gnostic e-learning, a phenomenon totally alien to the classical tradition.
But there is another reason. In his Idea of the University, John Henry Newman notes how, in the Medieval age, various heretical tendencies found ways to disseminate their views within the orthodox Catholic university, be it through secret societies or by transmuting their heresies into seemingly sound religious doctrine, which it took the likes of Aquinas [Thomas Aquinas] enormous effort to unmask and combat. Well, I think it's just about time that we orthodox believers returned the favor to liberal institutions - and to treat our presence within them as a test of their liberality, according to their own principles.
[VanityFair.com, 2021-11-16] Bari Weiss’s Anti-Cancel Culture University Is Already Hitting Speed Bumps. Two figureheads have parted ways with the University of Austin barely a week after its founding—and more growing pains are likely ahead.
[ExposedByCMD.org, 2021-11-30] Bari Weiss’ New “Fiercely Independent” University Closely Tied to Right-Wing Koch Network.
Return to Persagen.com